The head-to-head record between Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer heading into 2017 was 23-11 in the Spaniard’s favour.But, just four months into the year, Federer has already cut that deficit to 23-14.The 35-year-old’s latest success over his long-time rival came in the final of the Miami Masters on Sunday. Federer came through 6-3, 6-4.The win followed Federer’s victories over Nadal in the Australian Open final in January and at Indian Wells last month. It’s crazy to think that, 13 years after their first ever meeting, Federer vs. Nadal is still the most highly-anticipated match in men’s tennis.Of course, Federer’s body isn’t as ripe as it once was and he’s now planning an eight-week break before returning for the French Open."That is what it is going to look like. I need rest, my body needs healing and I need time as well to prepare. You will probably see me at the French,” Federer said, per Sky Sports.
"I want to stay healthy and enjoy myself because - when I am healthy and feeling good - I can produce tennis like this.
"When I am not feeling this good, there is no chance I will be in the finals competing with Rafa.”
Nadal's third final defeat
Nadal has also enjoyed an impressive revival after an injury-hit few years. The 30-year-old has appeared in three finals this year and will be among the favourites to win the French Open, which is played on clay, his favourite surface.
However, the fact that Nadal hasn’t been able to convert his chances - three finals in 2017, three losses, will irk him. So too will uninformed questions in post-match press conferences.
Bizarre exchange with a reporter
Nadal was faced with one such situation after losing the Miami final. Bizarrely, a reporter started a question by congratulating the 14-time Grand Slam winner on his victory.
“I lost, by the way,” Nadal started his answer, before the reporter tried to correct herself by saying, “I know, but it’s a win anyway,” - whatever that was supposed to mean.
Watch the awkward exchange below.
Maybe Nadal just met the ultimate troll in journalism.