Following Jordan Henderson’s debut outing for England on Wednesday, I have to be one of the few people to come to his defence after receiving harsh criticisms from the media and fans alike.

First off, no-one can be praised after Wednesday as the older crop of talent did not perform. France clearly outplayed England on our home turf.

I am a big admirer of Henderson, but I felt a call up was too much, too soon. Yet that won’t stop me defending a player that was not out as of his depth as much as the more ‘experienced’ players in the England set-up.

I was impressed with Andy Carroll from our neighbours though, who looked like England’s only real threat, but to say Henderson was poor is an insult to a young guy who is brimming with talent.

For one, Fabio Capello played him in a position that he rarely plays for when representing Sunderland; he is much more likely to play in an attacking role for the Black Cats and his performance was restricted by his need to sit back and defend.

As a pair, Gareth Barry and Jordan were overrun by the French onslaught. Henderson often found good positions and space.

How is Henderson supposed to make a meaningful impression if his access to the ball was minimal? He will be back.

Disclaimer: The views in this article are that of the writer and may not replicate those of the Professional Footballers' Association.

Do YOU want to write for GiveMeSport? Get started today by signing-up and submitting an article HERE: