Who won and Who Lost After Wimbledon Seedings

Published 2 Comments

Wimbledon is the oldest tennis tournament in the world, and widely considered the most prestigious of them all. It is arguably the most important of all the Grand Slams and A player can never truly be considered a success until he wins in the final at the All-England Club.

This year will be more momentous than others. Seismic changes are afoot which will change the tennis world for a very long time.

Unique formula

Wimbledon’s unique seeding formula led to a movement at the top of the men’s draw sees Novak Djokovic leapfrogged Rafael Nadal to become the No. 1 seed while reigning champion Andy Murray avoided a possible “group of death” when he moved from No. 5 to No. 3.

That moved Australian Open winner and world No. 3 Stanislas Wawrinka outside the top four, as he slipped below Roger Federer too.

- Another shock winner this year?
- Federer as you have never seen him before- Sharapova a commercial dream

Wimbledon is the only tournament of the year not to seed strictly by the ATP rankings. Since 2001, the All England Club has used a formula based on those rankings, but also gives added weight to grass-court results. (Players receive double the points for grass-court events in the past 12 months and a 75% bonus for grass-court events in the 12 months before that. This gives more successful grass-court players a higher ranking.)

Prior to that, a committee determined seeding and would often give advantage to Brits while earning scorn from clay-court virtuosos who dropped down in the seedings.

This year, the formula caused Murray to leap over Wawrinka and Federer to earn a crucial top-four seed. It’s also why Djokovic (2013 finalist) moved past Nadal (2013 first-round victim).

Meaningless to Djokovic and Nadal

Djokovic passing Nadal is meaningless. About the only thing that will change for Djokovic and Nadal is who gets introduced first if the two meet in the final.

If anyone had the right to be upset, it’s Wawrinka, who earned his No. 3 ranking and the protection it brings in a Grand Slam. But by going to No. 5, Wawrinka could theoretically face Murray in the quarters, Djokovic in the semis and Nadal in the finals.

The reason there’s no major change this year is because the seeding formula worked. The top four players on grass should be, in some order, Djokovic, Nadal, Murray and Federer.

The real problem would have come if Wawrinka had played better at Wimbledon last year and Federer had dropped to No. 5. Or if Murray’s injury absence last season made it harder for him to move past Wawrinka. Then, the uproar would have been deafening.

Do YOU want to write for GiveMeSport? Get started today by signing-up and submitting an article HERE:

Novak Djokovic
Andy Murray
Roger Federer
Rafael Nadal
Stanislas Wawrinka

Article Comments

Report author of article

Please let us know if you believe this article is in violation of our editorial policy, please only report articles for one of the following reasons.

Report author


This article has been written by a member of the GiveMeSport Writing Academy and does not represent the views of or SportsNewMedia. The views and opinions expressed are solely that of the author credited at the top of this article. and SportsNewMedia do not take any responsibility for the content of its contributors.

Want more content like this?

Like our GiveMeSport Facebook Page and you will get this directly to you.

Already Subscribed to Facebook, don't ask me again

Follow GiveMeSport on Twitter and you will get this directly to you.

Already Following, don't ask me again

Like our GiveMeSport - Tennis Page and you will get this directly to you.

Already Subscribed to G+, don't ask me again