James Anderson admits his wicketless showing at Lord's spurred him on to his best Ashes bowling figures on day one of the third Investec Test.
Anderson may be the leading wicket-taker in England's history but he was well short of his best at the home of cricket, returning a combined nought for 137 as Australia romped to a 405-run victory.
Brickbats flew his way in the aftermath, with former Australia batsman Mark Waugh suggesting England's leading bowler "did not look interested".
SUBMIT AN ARTICLE
Apply to become a GMS writer by signing up and submitting a 250 word test article: http://gms.to/haveyoursay5
He responded in the perfect fashion at Edgbaston, taking six for 47 as he moved the ball through the air and off the pitch to skittle the tourists for 136.
By stumps England were on 133 for three and in position to build a sizeable advantage, leaving Anderson to reflect on how a sit down with bowling coach Ottis Gibson helped lift him from the lows of Lord's.
"I've done some work with Ottis which has really helped - especially after a game when you don't get any wickets," he said.
"He thought that I was just putting the ball there during the Lord's game...(so) I worked on finishing my action a bit more.
"After getting no wickets, obviously the confidence takes a bit of a hit. But what it does do is make you more determined to get wickets and bowl better."
"I knew I could have bowled better than I did at Lord's. So after the work that I'd done, and the week off, I felt my confidence was pretty high.
"My job is to take wickets, set the tone with the new ball, try to make it move if I can."
Such was the dominance of the Australia victory last time out, the pendulum had appeared to swing decisively in their favour despite the series standing level at 1-1.
But Anderson sensed his side were ready to make a big response and banish those memories at the first opportunity.
"We were all disappointed with the way we performed at Lord's," he said.
"But having a week away has done us a bit of good, I think. We were all refreshed, all raring to go, knowing we could play better.
"That was what was driving us on. We were disappointed, and wanted to prove to people we could play better than that."
Australia would have been in even more dire trouble had opener Chris Rogers not knuckled down for 52 uncomfortable runs at the head of the innings.
He never quite got to grips with the pace trio of Anderson, Stuart Broad and Steven Finn, the latter making his Test comeback after two years out, but still comfortably top-scored.
Michael Clarke's decision to bat first will come under scrutiny given the state of the scoreboard but Rogers was fully behind the call.
"It was tough conditions but I don't think we expected them to be as hard as they were," he said.
"When the cloud came over it really swung and seamed. We still have a lot of question marks over that wicket, there's still cracks in it.
"I've got no problems with us batting on that. I don't think the focus is wrong. But finding a way? That's possibly a concern."
The 37-year-old, who had been a doubt for the match having suffered from a blow to the head in the second Test, also made a point of highlighting Finn's contribution.
Rogers captained the seamer at Middlesex at the height of the dip that saw him deemed 'unselectable' by England and the pair remain firm friends despite being in rival dressing rooms.
"I guess I saw him at his lowest ebb...he was probably in tears here at Edgbaston during a game here," said Rogers.
"It's a long way back and credit to him, he bowled particularly well, but he is the opposition at the moment."