Football

.

Fabian Delph may regret moving to Manchester City

Published 13 Comments

Football News
24/7

Last season he was the darling of Villa Park, playing an inspirational role in captaining his side to the FA Cup Final, and helping them to Premier League survival.

When he returned this season as a Manchester City player, he was roundly jeered and abused by the home support.

And halfway through the season, Fabian Delph might now be regretting his controversial move from the midlands in the summer.

SUBMIT AN ARTICLE

Apply to become a GMS writer by signing up and submitting a 250 word test article: http://gms.to/haveyoursay5

Article continues below

In January, Delph signed a new contract at Aston Villa, saying: "I'm proving that there still is loyalty in football."

This in itself came as a surprise. Delph was the top performer in a struggling Villa side and had been linked to bigger Premier League clubs such as Liverpool and Tottenham.

Article continues below

He further reiterated his commitment to the club in the summer when - after rumours that he had agreed to join City emerged - he released a statement again repeating that he was a “loyal player” and that he loved the club. Just a few days later, he completed a move to the Etihad Stadium.

His decision to go back on the promise he made to the club didn’t go down well with football supporters up and down the country, who believed he showed unprofessionalism and a lack of respect for the club.

Stoke City v Aston Villa - Premier League

The move to Manchester City hasn’t been a success. An injury-affected start to the season has seen him make only nine Premier League appearances, only two of which have been starts. He is fourth in line for a centre midfield spot in Manuel Pellegrini’s side, behind Yaya Toure, Fernandinho and Fernando. Even when he started a big game against Arsenal, he played on the left of midfield and had very little input on the game.

Given his former side’s position this season, he might still be happy with his decision to leave Villa, but may wish to reconsider his decision to head to Manchester. With an £8 million release clause in his contract, it would have been possible for almost any Premier League team to afford him.

Manchester City FC v VfL Borussia Monchengladbach - UEFA Champions League

His move to Manchester City was seen as one for financial gain, especially after he committed his future to Villa in January. His lack of football will not only bring him dissatisfaction, but it may hamper his chances of playing in the European Championships in France this summer.

If he had planned to leave Villa, he would have allowed his contract to run out in the summer. This makes it even more likely the move to City was a choice made in the heat of the moment, based on his financial gain.

Had he considered what it would mean for him in terms of first-team opportunities, it is unlikely he would have moved to the Etihad Stadium.

Do YOU want to write for GiveMeSport? Get started today by signing-up and submitting an article HERE: http://gms.to/writeforgms

Topics:
Aston Villa
Fabian Delph
Manchester City
Premier League
Football

Article Comments

Report author of article

Please let us know if you believe this article is in violation of our editorial policy, please only report articles for one of the following reasons.

Report author

DISCLAIMER

This article has been written by a member of the GiveMeSport Writing Academy and does not represent the views of GiveMeSport.com or SportsNewMedia. The views and opinions expressed are solely that of the author credited at the top of this article. GiveMeSport.com and SportsNewMedia do not take any responsibility for the content of its contributors.

Want more content like this?

Like our GiveMeSport Facebook Page and you will get this directly to you.

Already Subscribed to Facebook, don't ask me again

Follow GiveMeSport on Twitter and you will get this directly to you.

Already Following, don't ask me again

Like our GiveMeSport Page and you will get this directly to you.

Already Subscribed to G+, don't ask me again