On Saturday in Australia, the main event saw a 49-year-old Triple H take on a 53-year-old Undertaker.While that was billed as the 'last time ever', it appears following the finish that the notion only applies in a one-on-one capacity - their business is far from done.Triple H and Undertaker have had a storied rivalry that has seen the two men battle at three WrestleManias and fans debated whether they needed to have one more blow-off match.Of course, with the huge sums Australia paid the company to roll out the big guns, the WWE called on their biggest names.Many fans have questioned whether Triple H should have agreed to main event a pay-per-view like this in 2018, especially with Kane and Shawn Michaels chucked in as special attractions at ringside.The main event saw plenty of weapons and finishers to protect the age of both men, but the Undertaker is certainly not the performer he was 10 years ago.Perhaps the greatest sign of this came after Triple H Pedigreed the Phenom and the camera gave us a close up of Undertaker attempting to kick out.As you can see by the tweet below, Undertaker clearly fails to kicks out in time and, in kayfabe, he should have lost the match there and then. Instead, the ref pulls his hand and hambles that 'Taker will pull up sooner rather than later.

In truth, 'Taker can't work a focused one-on-one match anymore without some bells and whistles attached and that's exactly what HBK and Kane provided.

It seems as though we are heading for a Brothers of Destruction versus D-Generation-X in the near future, possibly at the WWE's next event in Saudi Arabia next November, Crown Jewel.

What do you guys think: should Undertaker and Triple H still be wrestling? Is it a good idea to keep wheeling them out when guys like Finn Balor wasn't even on this card?

Please SUBSCRIBE to our GiveMeSport WWE YouTube channel where we have exclusive interviews and inside scoops.

LISTEN TO OUR LATEST PODCAST WHERE WE PREVIEW WWE 2K19 AS WELL AS TALK TO COVER STAR AJ STYLES AND XAVIER WOODS