Tottenham now have two games under their belt at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium.

After two years in limbo at Wembley, supporters have finally moved into their new arena and they've been treated to arguably the best stadium in the Premier League.

With state of the art facilities, seats close to the pitch and a character that most modern stadiums lack, Tottenham seem to have struck gold with their new home in north London.

Not only that, but the acoustics seem to be rustling up a truly special atmosphere, pushing them on to victory against Crystal Palace and Manchester City in their opening games.

Nevertheless, with any new stadium, there are always going to be teething problems and Tottenham are still getting their head around some of the new logistics.

Tottenham's new stadium

There were complaints about the volume of the PA system, certain pies being in short supply and the imperfections of the local transport infrastructure.

However, it would appear that the early issues are working both ways and Tottenham aren't best pleased with the behaviour of certain fans at their new ground.

That's because an email was sent around to fans after their Champions League win, declaring that 'several' supporters had been banned after just two games.

Bans for persistent standing

The crime? Persistent standing.

The email explained: “It was an amazing night on Tuesday and an intense atmosphere which undoubtedly played its role in the team’s success in the first leg of our Champions League quarter-final against Manchester City.

“However, it is important that everyone is able to see the match and enjoy it. We appreciate that fans will rise up at key moments in the match.

"Persistently standing for the whole match or for long periods, along with failing to heed requests from the stewards and fellow fans to be seated, is not acceptable behaviour, notwithstanding it’s against ground regulations.

“Several bans have, therefore, been issued to fans as a consequence of their persistent standing.”

It's worth noting that the length of these bans - which may differ on a case-to-case basis - are currently unknown.

Are the bans fair?

The reason for these suspensions has certainly caused debate amongst football fans and it's easy to see both sides of the argument.

On the one hand, it's almost a given that fans will stand for the entire game in certain sections, although that is more often the case in the away end.

However, supporters have paid for their seat at the end of the day and it's understandable that certain attendees won't want to stand for 90 minutes just to see the game.

Besides, you could wind up with a stadium ban...

Do you think Tottenham have been too harsh here? Have your say in the comments section below.