Did Francis Coquelin deserve to be sent off against Crystal Palace

Published 1 Comments

Football News

As Francis Coquelin was being substituted and walking off the pitch against Crystal Palace at the weekend, it was clear for everyone to see that Arsene Wenger was protecting his player from being sent off.

Coquelin had already been cautioned in the first half for what must have been persistent fouling and then he was lucky not to be sent off, committing two further fouls in the second half while on a yellow card. Or was he?

This got me thinking, is your first foul after a booking a definite red card? We’ve all seen players on a yellow card getting sent off for a very timid offence, or something that you would normally say doesn't warrant a caution. But seeing as they were on a yellow we grudgingly accept that the sending off was warranted and deserved, or at the very least, it was coming.

Football fans can sometimes see a player on a yellow card as being on their last chance, or the card itself as a final warning before dismissal. But is this officially the case?

After checking the laws of the game here there is no mention of a separate ruling for the second yellow card.

The seven caution-able offences listed are: unsporting behaviour, dissent by word or action, persistent infringement of the Laws of the Game, delaying the restart of play, failure to respect the required distance when play is restarted with a corner kick, free kick or throw-in, entering or re-entering the field of play without the referee's permission, and deliberately leaving the field of play without the referee's permission.

The only reason I can see for Le Coq receiving his yellow card was for persistent fouling.

Sending off? notes that Coquelin committed four fouls in six attempts for the ball, which would constitute persistent fouling surely, with some of his challenges at the weekend more, clumsy than vicious or deliberate.

But each time he committed a foul after his initial booking we could hear the crown chanting ‘OFF, OFF, OFF’, baying for the blood coloured card, as they knew he was treading on thin ice. But were they right to expect it?

As the rules determining the second booking-sending off, are something of a grey area, is this something that needs to be looked at by the powers that be or should we accept the first booking as a warning and that one more infringement and you’re off?

Do you think Coquelin should have been sent off?

Do YOU want to write for GiveMeSport? Get started today by signing-up and submitting an article HERE:

Crystal Palace
Arsene Wenger
Francis Coquelin
Premier League

Article Comments

Read more

Report author of article

Please let us know if you believe this article is in violation of our editorial policy, please only report articles for one of the following reasons.

Report author


This article has been written by a member of the GiveMeSport Writing Academy and does not represent the views of or SportsNewMedia. The views and opinions expressed are solely that of the author credited at the top of this article. and SportsNewMedia do not take any responsibility for the content of its contributors.

Want more content like this?

Like our GiveMeSport Facebook Page and you will get this directly to you.

Already Subscribed to Facebook, don't ask me again

Follow GiveMeSport on Twitter and you will get this directly to you.

Already Following, don't ask me again

Like our GiveMeSport Page and you will get this directly to you.

Already Subscribed to G+, don't ask me again