Liverpool must pay Burnley ?6.5million for striker Danny Ings, tribunal rules

Published Add your comment

Football News

Liverpool will pay Burnley ?6.5million for striker Danny Ings - a new record for a fee ordered by a tribunal.

The figure eclipses the ?3.5million sum Chelsea had to pay Manchester City in 2009 for forward Daniel Sturridge - coincidentally now also at Anfield - although add-on clauses took the England international's eventual cost to ?8.3million.

Liverpool have also announced they will pay a further ?1.5million in add-ons in accordance with the Professional Football Compensation Committee's ruling while Press Association Sport understands there is a 20 per cent cut due to Burnley on any future profit should the club sell the player.

Ings allowed his contract to run down with the Clarets last season before moving to Anfield in the summer.

Liverpool offered ?6million for the player as Burnley were entitled to compensation, with Ings under 23 years old at the time.

That was rejected as the Clarets, after a reported ?12million bid from Tottenham, valued the player in excess of ?10million.

"Liverpool Football Club would like to thank the PFCC panel for their time and diligence in deciding this matter," said a club statement.

"We believe the process was conducted fairly and we respect the outcome.

"We are pleased for Danny Ings, in particular, that this chapter is now complete and he can look forward to a long and successful career at Liverpool."

Do YOU want to write for GiveMeSport? Get started today by signing-up and submitting an article HERE:

Premier League
Manchester City
Danny Ings
Daniel Sturridge

Article Comments

Read more

Report author of article

Please let us know if you believe this article is in violation of our editorial policy, please only report articles for one of the following reasons.

Report author


This article has been written by a member of the GiveMeSport Writing Academy and does not represent the views of or SportsNewMedia. The views and opinions expressed are solely that of the author credited at the top of this article. and SportsNewMedia do not take any responsibility for the content of its contributors.

Want more content like this?

Like our GiveMeSport Facebook Page and you will get this directly to you.

Already Subscribed to Facebook, don't ask me again

Follow GiveMeSport on Twitter and you will get this directly to you.

Already Following, don't ask me again

Like our GiveMeSport Page and you will get this directly to you.

Already Subscribed to G+, don't ask me again