There was plenty of controversy surrounding VAR in this weekend's Premier League fixtures.West Ham United, Arsenal and Everton are just a few of the teams that may feel aggrieved that decisions did not go their way.Following the weekend's events, Ex-Premier League referee Dermot Gallagher has cast his verdict on all the major decisions in England's top tier.Gallagher was as a Premier League referee for 15 years between 1992-2007 and now gives his opinions on officiating on Sky Sports.View his take on all the controversial decisions this weekend below...

West Ham's late disallowed equaliser vs Chelsea

West Ham thought they had snatched a dramatic equaliser when Maxwel Cornet found the back of the net, only for VAR to intervene. The goal was ruled out for a foul by Jarrod Bowen on Edouard Mendy.

"He saw the same images. He saw the same angle. I don't know what changed for him. For whatever reason, the VAR focused on the goalkeeper and felt he was injured. He hasn't got the same view as Andy Madley on the field. That's what played a major part in this. The referee had the best view, A on the pitch and B on the monitor."

Verdict: Wrong decision, goal should have stood

Newcastle's disallowed goal vs Crystal Palace

Tyrick Mitchell's own goal against Newcastle was ruled out after Joe Willock collided with Vicente Guaita. Willock was in fact pushed into the goalkeeper by Mitchell prior to the own-goal.

"He can either give a penalty, which I think it is, or he could take the option he did, which is the worst option."

Verdict: Wrong decision, Newcastle should have been handed a penalty

Arsenal's disallowed goal vs Manchester United

Arsenal thought they had taken the lead against United when Gabriel Martinelli found the back of the net. However, the goal was ruled out for a foul by Martin Odegaard on Christian Eriksen in the build-up.

"I thought it was a foul. And when the VAR checked it I was quite confident they would overturn it. Once Paul Tierney goes to the monitor and he sees that [the push] I think he was always going to give a foul."

Verdict: Right decision, goal should have been disallowed for a foul

Alexis Mac Allister's disallowed screamer for Brighton vs Leicester City

Mac Allister scored a howitzer for Brighton vs Leicester but the goal was ruled out for offside.

"The process was right. It took a long time but it was correct, it was offside."

Verdict: Right decision, the goal should have been disallowed for offside

Leeds' non-penalty against Brentford

Leeds wanted a penalty when Crysencio Summerville went to ground under the challenge of Aaron Hickey. Nothing was given.

"The shirt pull, the referee doesn't see and the VAR can't act. As he goes into the box he lets go of the shirt. If he had pulled the shirt like he did going into the box, without doubt penalty. Because he lets go of the shirt... has he clipped him or is he going forward? That's the element of doubt. And at that point they said 'the first one yes, but we can't give it because it's outside [the box]. The second one, maybe, but we can't give a maybe'. It didn't hit the threshold so they played on."

Verdict: Right decision, Leeds should not have been given a penalty

Everton's disallowed goal against Liverpool

Conor Coady thought he had given his side the lead in the Merseyside Derby, only for the goal to be ruled out for offside.

"Whether it hits James Milner's foot or not is immaterial. The law says 'he has to deliberately play the ball or be in possession of the ball'. That is an attempted block. The law is quite clear. in that situation, if it strikes his foot and deflects to Coady, it doesn't play him onside. He has to be in possession of the ball, control of the ball or deliberately play the ball. His sole intention is to block the cross. It flies off his boot no doubt about it, but it's negated."

Verdict: Right decision, Coady was offside

Van Dijk's challenge on Amadou Onana

Frank Lampard claims Van Dijk should have been given a red card for a foul on Onana. The Dutchman was given a yellow card.

"I think yellow card. He goes down. But the maximum impact comes on top of the foot. Because he's come a short distance, he hasn't got the speed and intensity. It's a foul and a yellow card.

Verdict: Right decision, Van Dijk should have been given a yellow card

Gallagher also commented that VAR should not be scrapped despite heavy criticism of how it operates.

QUIZ: At what club did these 40 players start their professional career?